Susan Stryker talked about how history can be
- a monument to ourselves
- nostalgia
- a tool for future work
She was most interested in the last interpretation, and discussed it mostly through the lens of the GLBT Historical Society in San Francisco, which she directed for five years after being a regular researcher and volunteer there.
During this talk I was thinking about how a subtheme of this conference seemed to be trans inclusion and transphobia. (Strkyer is transgender, as is Michael Waldman, who introduced her.) A woman in the audience commented on this, too, in the Q&A.
Anyway, Stryker talked about the Compton's Cafeteria riot of 1966, about which she made the documentary Screaming Queens. This instance of queer resistance to the cops took place in a tranny/gay hustler hang out in San Francisco. The riot hadn't been much known until Stryker found information about it in the Historical Center archives in the centerfold of the program for SF's first Pride Parade. Even so the Parade was billed as "Christopher St. West," based on the Stonewall Riot of 1969.
She kept using the term "homophile," which was new to me. I like this definition from the Wikipedia entry, "The word is sometimes used colloquially in the GLBT community to describe a person who identifies as straight and who is strongly attracted to GLBT individuals for social relationships and is attracted to GLBT culture and community." She seemed to be using it the way many radicals generally use the word "liberal," i.e. disparagingly. Also new to me, she referenced a delicious sounding book, Archive Stories: Facts, Fictions, and the Writing of History.
She gave some history of transgender people in America, including a statute from 1848 against public cross-dressing.
Some random notes from the margin of my memo pad:
- The CUNY Grad Center uses Mac laptops, and they have VLC, an open source video player installed on them.
- Kelly Shortandqueer keeps a spreadsheet of everyone he's given each issue of his zines to. I think that's fascinating. Partially because it speaks to the issue of control in the zines vs. blogs discussion. With blogs you cannot have that level of control, even with private accounts and the like. Also it's just plain anal/perfectionist good times.
- I have a low tolerance for conflict. In this presentation, as with all of the others I attended minus one, there was at least one person in the audience giving the presenters a hard time, either in a friendly or unfriendly manner. In Stryker's talk, it was decidedly unfriendly. The conflict had to do with whether or not The Stud (1960s San Francisco) was a psychedelic leather bar. An audience member said no. A lot. Obnoxiously.
Two more entries on GLBT ALMS to go!
Comments
Emily (not verified)
Thu, 05/22/2008 - 5:03pm
Permalink
I also really enjoyed
I also really enjoyed Stryker's talk. I thought it was really interesting the way she talked about the word 'gay' and how it used to be an umbrella term for lots of different sexual/gender identities, much the way many of us now use the word 'queer.' A good reminder to me that language is historically contingent.
And I also loved kelly shortandqueer's spreadsheet! though I think we should figure out a way to automate it...
annakat (not verified)
Sun, 08/31/2008 - 1:02pm
Permalink
It is radical how the
It is radical how the meaning of words have changed from generation to generation. I'm 60+ years old, when I was brought up we never knew there was a word homosexual. Queer meant different, gay meant happy, thongs were sandals you wore with strips between your toes. Now I have family and some fantastic friends that are homosexuals who use to be call queer, and are now called gay, and thongs are not sandals worn on your feet but are now strips of cloth worn between your buttocks. Time changes everything I guess.