Geographically Subdivide Race Relations, Por Favor, LC

Sent to's Suggest Terminology thingamabobber:

I'm curious why "Race relations" does not subdivide geographically. Would you consider enabling that designation?

I know I should have added an explanation or some warrant, but it's hard to figure out how to explain something that seems so obvious.


#1 Bill

jenna, the syntax for race relations in a specific place is [place]--Race relations, not Race relations--[place]. That's why there's a general see reference (field 360) on the authority record for the heading, telling us to search also under the subdivision Race relations under countries, cities, etc.